THE pawn: I would like to see them, even if they are long. I would show you guys my games against it but they are all to long. Kschess: Maybe its me being new here ,but you guys give the chessmaster alot of credit. WorldChampeen: As a perfunctory experiment I did pitt Shredder versus CM I'm not sure if I had Shredder on at full strength, it was an interesting game. Are you sure you were playing against it and not a level or two weaker? ( maybe it's just me who's not good enough.but from what I've seen.)
I don't doubt in your honesty, but that game was way too strange to be played against C. The black play wasn't at my eyes around the rating of chessmaster 9000. your moves are even more obvious, and the computer doesn't react to your imminent attacks.
Against me, he never did such a thing, and unless the sacrifice was quite valuable, he never lost his queen. I have it, and even after games and games against it, I still cannot trap his queen like you so easily did, and it was quite easy to see where your rook was getting at f2 and the computer still let his queen in your claws. Yeah, the opening was quite strange with an even stranger knight sacrifice, but I just do not reckognize the c.9000 here. THE pawn: I've played your game Hann, and I simply cannot see how you were playing against chessmaster 9000. REFINE SEARCH: White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Chessmaster wins | Chessmaster loses David Kittinger also offered another engine personality on versions until the Chessmaster 4000 build was released.Ģ0. A relative of The King (Computer) engine, its programmer is Johan de Koning.
0 kommentar(er)
